An Ascendant Constitutional Theory Is a Threat to American Science
The idea of a “unitary executive” is now being extended to America’s scientific establishment, with potentially devastating effects.
TL;DR
- A new Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulation proposes shifting control of public science funding from scientists to political appointees.
- This change is linked to the 'unitary-executive theory,' which seeks to consolidate power within the presidency.
- The proposed rule would allow political appointees to decide which projects receive funding and to cancel existing grants.
- Critics argue this move replaces scientific judgment with political pressure, potentially harming scientific progress and innovation.
- Historically, U.S. science funding has relied on scientific judgment and accountability through Congress and the scientific community.
- The administration's actions are seen as part of a larger trend toward increased presidential control over executive agencies.
- The scientific community has largely condemned the proposed rule, urging public comment and action.
- Addressing the threat to science requires a broader reevaluation of how American government and science agencies are run.