Deal or no deal, regime change in Iran is the only solution
A deal has been struck with Iran, which will reportedly be signed on Friday. On any given day before then, and even after, the United States could launch strikes on Iran, take over Kharg Island, or target the Houthis. President Donald Trump knows how to keep the Iranian regime off balance using media, social media, leaks, and expectations to manipulate the environment. That is what makes him a master negotiator. But a real solution to instability in the Middle East and global oil markets can only come from regime change in Iran.
TL;DR
- A deal with Iran is reportedly set to be signed, but the US could still take action against Iran before or after.
- President Trump's negotiating tactics are described as effective in keeping the Iranian regime off balance.
- The article argues that a real solution to Middle East instability and oil market issues requires regime change in Iran.
- Current White House goals include destroying Iran's missile capabilities, severing support for proxies, and preventing nuclear weapon acquisition.
- The reported deal allegedly addresses nuclear material only "conceptually" and defers harder questions to later talks.
- Past agreements like the JCPOA are described as failed, and a new deal needs verifiable dismantlement of enrichment capacity, missile limits, and an end to proxy sponsorship.
- The current Iranian government is unlikely to surrender the instruments of its control, making any agreement a temporary measure.
- The central question is whether the Iranian regime can be trusted to adhere to any settlement.