California's terrible election policies create justifiable conspiracy theories
If you want people to have faith in elections, you must conduct them in a transparent and timely fashion. It is the opposite of what California does, which is why the conspiracy theories about California’s elections cannot simply be dismissed as wild and unfounded.
TL;DR
- California's election policies are criticized for being neither transparent nor timely, leading to conspiracy theories.
- In the Los Angeles mayoral race, late-counted ballots reportedly benefited Democratic challenger Nithya Raman over independent Spencer Pratt.
- The author suggests that California Democrats' blocking of voter identification methods and weeks-long ballot counting processes contribute to accusations of cheating.
- The article posits that if California counted votes on Election Day, election issues would be avoided.