Is the US actually too chicken to take on China for trade?

A weak yuan guarantees Beijing massive trade surplus even as the White House tries tamp down on Chinese imports

Is the US actually too chicken to take on China for trade?

TL;DR

  • US imports from China have fallen, but this doesn't equate to winning the trade war as China's share of value added in imports remains high.
  • The White House's new AI border 'detective' tool to identify transshipped goods is seen as a complex 'Whac-A-Mole' game.
  • Despite efforts, US manufacturing employment has not significantly increased, and the US import bill remains high.
  • The undervalued Chinese yuan is identified as a critical driver of China's massive exports, swamping the US and threatening global industrial development.
  • While economists point to domestic factors for China's surplus and US deficit, the article argues that exchange rate intervention could provide necessary pressure for policy changes.
  • China's export dominance has grown significantly, weighing heavily on global economies.
  • The Plaza Accord and the yuan's appreciation after the global financial crisis are cited as evidence of currency's power in trade rebalancing.
  • Revaluing the yuan could induce other policy changes, stimulating Chinese domestic consumption and potentially encouraging fiscal restraint in the US.
  • The US has tools like Section 301 of the Trade Act to pressure China on currency undervaluation, and could coordinate with allies.
  • The current approach of targeting weaker countries for transshipment is seen as a failure to confront China directly due to a lack of willingness.