The case for a both/and national identity
The debate on American identity cleaves between heritage and creed. The heritage side, prevalent among traditionalists and post-liberal conservatives, tends to define “Americaness” as coming from American stock — being born to American mothers and fathers who were born to American mothers and fathers who, in turn, also have roots in American land. The further back the lineage, the better, especially if it entails living through one of America’s great wars or periods of economic and social upheaval. This common history produces a common culture that, notwithstanding its pockets of particularity, is unified by shared experiences, shared language, and shared suffering, sacrifice, and triumph.

TL;DR
- American identity is debated, split between definitions based on heritage and creed.
- The heritage perspective defines 'Americaness' through ancestry and shared historical experiences.
- The creedal perspective defines American identity by adherence to foundational governing principles, particularly the Constitution.
- The article suggests both perspectives are valid in relation to each other.