Democrats Are Failing the Waymo Test
Cities that say no to driverless cars are blocking a technology that would change their residents’ lives for the better.
TL;DR
- Waymo's self-driving robotaxis operate in several red/purple states but are restricted in blue states due to opposition from labor unions, activists, and politicians.
- Opponents cite concerns about road safety and job losses for human drivers, while proponents highlight potential to avert thousands of deaths and injuries annually.
- Studies indicate Waymo vehicles are significantly safer than human drivers, with far fewer crashes and injuries per mile.
- Despite safety benefits, Waymo faces challenges with unpredictable 'edge cases' and has obstructed traffic and emergency services in specific incidents.
- Labor unions are leading the political resistance, fearing a domino effect on jobs across the transportation sector.
- The article frames the resistance as a test for progressives, questioning if they have become too fearful of technological change and corporate interests.
- Proposed legislation in Washington, D.C., aims to balance Waymo's adoption with safety requirements and mitigation for displaced workers.
- The author suggests that while some restrictions are needed, particularly for edge cases, the overall goal should be to actively shape and regulate this technology for public benefit, drawing parallels to the advent of railroads.