Historia
1 de jul de 2026
Steve Hilton and Xavier Becerra to Face Off in California Governor's Race
Republican commentator Steve Hilton and Democratic former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra have advanced to the November general election for California governor. Hilton, a former Fox News host endorsed by Donald Trump, secured the second spot in the open primary, while billionaire Tom Steyer ended his campaign after failing to advance.
Republican commentator Steve Hilton’s surprise advance in deep-blue California has set up a starkly polarized governor’s race against Democrat Xavier Becerra, with each side insisting the contest is either a historic “chance for change” or a dangerous Trump-era throwback.
Liberal outlets frame Hilton as a long-shot outsider whose success is remarkable but structurally constrained. The Guardian stresses that a “recent immigrant” and former UK Conservative strategist has become “a serious contender” in a state that has shut Republicans out of statewide power for two decades, yet notes “the odds remain stacked against him” in November’s runoff against Becerra.1 CBS News similarly underscores that Becerra’s late surge overtook Hilton in the slow-count primary and that prominent Democrats quickly rallied behind Becerra to block “Trump’s handpicked candidate.”2 Liberal coverage also foregrounds Tom Steyer’s progressive base and his call for Californians to “unite behind Xavier Becerra” to stop Hilton, warning it would be a “travesty” if he won.3
Conservative media, by contrast, treat Hilton’s second-place finish as a breakthrough and validation of a populist revolt against one-party Democratic rule. The Washington Examiner highlights that “Trump-backed Steve Hilton advances to general election,” emphasizing his 25% primary share and agenda of tax cuts and rolling back gun restrictions.4 Fox News amplifies Hilton’s claim that California now has a “chance for change” and “a new direction instead of another four years of the insanity,” casting the race as a referendum on Democratic governance and cost-of-living woes.5
Both sides use Steyer as a foil, but with opposite morals. Conservatives deride him for burning over $550 million in “failed bids for office,” arguing his third-place finish proves voters are rejecting big-spending progressives.6 Liberals cite his concession and accusations of massive corporate opposition spending to reinforce a narrative of entrenched economic interests shaping California politics.7
What both camps largely avoid is introspection about their own blind spots: liberals underplay voter discontent with Democratic dominance, while conservatives soft-pedal Hilton’s Trump ties in a state where Trump remains deeply unpopular—even as national Republicans like JD Vance cheer that California “just needs better political leadership.”
8