There Is Already a Word for the Deep Moral Failures of AI
This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.
TL;DR
- The author uses the word 'sin' to describe the dehumanizing effects of AI, such as marketing digital girlfriends and robot companions.
- Christian thinkers and writers, including Ivan Illich, Charles Taylor, Jennifer Frey, Paul Kingsnorth, Carl Trueman, and Pope Leo, are seen as insightful critics of AI because they are comfortable using words like 'sin' and address the anthropological crisis.
- These critics, particularly Trueman and Pope Leo, view the crisis posed by technological modernity as primarily anthropological, questioning 'What is man?' in the face of AI.
- Secular critics often focus on utilitarian concerns like environmental toll, intellectual property theft, bias, and autonomous weapons, which are measurable but may miss deeper philosophical issues.
- Christian humanism, with its concept of humans being made in the 'Imago Dei' (image of God), offers a definition of humanity based on a transcendent source rather than on capabilities that machines may replicate.
- The article argues that a clear, positive conception of human nature is necessary to defend human dignity against AI, and that secular humanism may struggle to provide this without a similar foundational premise.