Histoire
1 juil. 2026

NY Gov. Hochul and Tom Homan Clash Over ICE Presence in New York

New York Governor Kathy Hochul is opposing a federal plan to increase the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the state, calling it an overreach. In response, former Trump administration border czar Tom Homan vowed to "flood" New York with ICE agents despite the governor's resistance.

New York’s escalating showdown over immigration enforcement has become a test of where federal power ends and state authority begins, with Gov. Kathy Hochul and former Trump border czar Tom Homan using the state as a proxy battlefield for the 2026 immigration wars.

Hochul frames the planned surge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers as a breach of both policy assurances and constitutional boundaries. She argues that federal agents are engaging in “overreach” and “excessive engagement and activities far beyond what was ever promised by the president or what Tom Homan has told me.” Her state budget proposals would restrict local police cooperation with ICE, roll back 287(g) agreements, and limit access to “sensitive locations,” signaling a strategy to choke off practical avenues for federal enforcement inside New York.

Homan and conservative allies, by contrast, cast Hochul’s resistance as a direct threat to public safety and a political stunt. At the Border Security Expo, Homan vowed to “flood the zone” in New York with a rapid ICE surge, promising residents they would “see more ICE agents [than] you ever seen before.” On Fox News, he sharpened the defiance: “Governor Hochul, I’m not asking either… We’re going to flood the zone in New York — we have to,” insisting, “They’re not going to stop us. They can put all the roadblocks they want, but we’re [going to] do this job.”

Both sides invoke Donald Trump to legitimize their positions. Hochul notes Trump previously told her he would not send an ICE surge “unless I ask,” adding, “I’m not asking,” to argue that New York retains a veto over such operations. Homan, however, treats Trump’s broader deportation agenda and Congress-backed enforcement authority as a mandate that supersedes blue-state objections.

The clash thus hinges less on facts about crime or migration—and more on who gets to decide how, and where, federal immigration law is enforced: a governor claiming to defend her constituents from “dangerous federal overreach,” or a former federal official insisting New York must “get the hell out of the way” of a national crackdown.